How green is your community?

Score sheet

On a scale of 1 to 6 - with 6 being best, our community............

1. Encourages development within or near the existing built-up area or close to public transportation?

2. Encourages development that is served by existing rather than new water and waster water facilities?

3. Encourages development in areas having no or limited endangered or other ecological impacts?

4. Encourages development that conserves water quality, natural hydrology, habitat - water bodies and wetlands?

5. Encourages development that seeks to preserve irreplaceable prime agriculture and unique farmhand?

6. Encourages development that seeks to preserve open space - forested and other habitat conservation lands?

7. Encourages redevelopment opportunities even if the site is complicated by environmental contamination?

8. Encourages development that seeks to reduce automobile vehicle use in favor of alternative transportation - walking, biking and mass transit?

9. Encourages housing development in close proximity to employment opportunities to reduce the number and length of vehicle journey-to-work trips?

10. Encouragers location of schools to facilitate physical activity - walking to and from school?

11. Discourages development of steep slope topography to minimize storm water erosion by preserving steep slope vegetation?

12. Encourages use of conservation design principles in new development that seeks to preserve open space to protect native habitat, wetlands and water features?

13. Encourages inter connection of existing and new development to promote sidewalk, pathway and street connectedness?

14. Encourages higher density development to promote mass transportation efficiency and greater walkability?

15. Encourages development that intersperses owner and renter occupied housing available to a wide range of household incomes?

16. Encourages development that orientates parking away for street frontages to increase pedestrian use of street frontages?

17. Encourages use of mass transit?

18. Has a plan for direct and safe pedestrian partway connections to local destinations, neighborhood centers and other regional communities?

19. Has to provide a variety of open spaces and recreational facilities close to resident work and home locations?

20. Encourages community participation in project planning by individuals most likely to be directly impacted by the project?

21. Encourages community -based local food production promoting direct access to fresh foods while reducing long-distance food transport?

22. Has requirements that limit construction activity pollution such as soil erosion, waterway sedimentation and airborne dust generation?

23. Encourages energy efficiency and use of green building products for new construction?

24. Encourages low-impact landscaping techniques and rain gardens to reduce landscaping irrigations supporting water conservation and ground water recharge?

25. Encourages adaptive reuse of historic and other buildings including reuse of scavenged building materials when possible?

26. Encourages building designs that reduce heat islands that can effect the micro climate surrounding the building?

27. Discourages light pollution by limiting light-trespass and amount of light produced by luminaries?

28. Maintains a comprehensive plan describing the goals for future development of our community?

29. Provides a mechanism to educate the residents of the community of the goals to green the community?

30. Encourages community participation in events promoting the greening of the community?

__________________________

1____________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

2____________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

3____________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

4____________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

5____________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

6____________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

7____________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

8____________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

9____________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

10 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

11 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

12 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

13 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

14 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

15 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

16 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

17 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

18 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

19 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

20 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

21 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

22 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

23 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

24 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

25 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

26 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

27 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

28 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

29 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

30 __________1_____2_____3____4____5____6

Send us your Results to Chuck Eckenstahler at

pctecken@comcast.net

We will be posted them on

http://greencitydevelopment.blogspot.com/

Printable Score Sheet

http://how-green-is-your-community.googlegroups.com/web/How+Green+is+Your+Community+Score+Sheet.pdf?gda=OwboGl4AAACcdmIySicyLVeEshDjgij2AWD8GBg8XMOV-0dkw1OAPfqEofuCIS8l20hHA12DrlCT6QGMxuGLR54iIeAYiUnhzQkGNBVZkeE4mW5zRQpAQeOwpdWz5ftt1dlzlu5J-bE

How Green is Your Community?

How Green is Your City?

Power Points (the one by Eckenstahler explains the Green Questionnaire)

Municipal Survey Form 

Results from the First Survey conducted at the International Clerks Conference in May 2009

http://groups.google.com/group/how-green-is-your-community

You can use this material to self evaluate "How Green is Your City?"

How Green is Your Municipality?

Seminar for the:

International Institute of Municipal Clerks Conference

Thursday May 21, 2009 10:00 am to 12:00 Noon

Palmer House Hotel Chicago, IL

Each participant provide approximately 20 minute presentation, followed by approximately 30 minutes Q & A.

Moderator Mary Haynes, Clerk, City of Peoria, Illinois

___________________

Presentors - in Order of Presentation

Charles Eckenstahler CEDc - Farm land & open space preservation, Green Checklist

Allen Morris Vice President, Teng Development - LEED, Public Buildings, building retrofits

Chris Setti, 6 Sigma Black Belt and Special Projects manager for the City of Peoria "Green Process", Peoria Urban Living Iniative

Craig Hullinger AICP - Green Land Planning, Sustainable Development, Economic Development

_______________________________

 Biographies of Presentors

Chuck Eckenstahler is a Senior Consultant with McKenna Associates a,Northville Michigna based municipal planning consulting firm serving clients in Micihgan, Ohio and Indiana. He is a 35 year veteran real estate and municipal planning consultant who teaches economic development subjects in the Graduate School of Business at Purdue Northwest, Westville, Indiana and serves on the faculty of the Lowell Stahl Center for Commercial Real Estate Studies at Lewis University, Oakbrook Illinois. He holds two Masters' Degrees, one from Governors State University and the other from the University of Notre Dame. He is an active writer, having more than 100 articles published on various economic development, land use planning and real estate development topics. He can be contacted at ceckenstahler@mckc.com or by phone at 219-861-2077.  http://www.mcka.com/

Allen Morris Vice President, Teng Development.  He has extensive experience in the planning and construction of major public buildings, and has participated inthe development of numerous with LEED and "green technology buildings. He has also worked on project planning and development.    http://www.teng.com/ 

Chris Setti is the Special Projects Manager for the City of Peoria.  He is a 6 Sigma Black Belt and formerly the City's Senior Economic Development Specialist.  In his current role at the City, Chris spearheads the City's energy efficiency efforts, including coordinating the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant.  Chris has also helped lead the Peoria Urban Living Initiative, an effort to increase home ownership in older neighborhoods in Peoria.  Chris has a Bachelor' degree in Political Science and a Master's degree in Public Administration.

http://renaissanceparkpeoria.com

Craig Harlan Hullinger AICP, is the Economic Development Director for the City of Peoria, Illinois. He has developed numerous successful “Green” developments, and is currently guiding Peoria’s efforts to create new urban mixed use development in the downtown area along the Riverfront. Craig has a BA Degree in Public Administration and a Master's Degree in Environmental Planning. He can be contacted at 309 494- 8639 or Hullingerc@gmail.com.com. More information can be found at http://www.peoria.blog.com/

_____________________________________________

Presentation Summaries 

Green Land Planning, Sustainable Development

 Craig Hullinger Presentation

There has been an ongoing evolution in land planning to safeguard and improve the environment.  Over the past 40 years cities and counties have become much more sophisticated in requiring storm water retention, wetland conservation, open space, and pedestrian walkways and bikeways.

Planners have also become more sophisticated in trying to reduce traffic congestion, and improve connectivity among residential, commercial, industrial, and insitutional land uses. Minimizing the use of energy and the increased use of "clean" energy is also a trend. Hullinger will present these developments.

References

http://peoria.blog.com/ 

http://planning.blogspot.com/

http://sustainablepeoria.blogspot.com/

http://greencitydevelopment.blogspot.com/

Charles Eckenstahler Presentation

Craig Hullinger Presentation

• Share 
• Favorite 
• Get File 
• More...
 
•  

• Post to
 
• Blogger 
• WordPress 
• Twitter 
• Facebook 
• Delicious

Green City Iimc Prese...1 min ago0 views, 0 commentstags: chrisEdit | Delete | Share

Sustainable Development Commission

Development Standards Sub-Group

Monday May 11, 2009

4:00 PSA Dewberry

Meeting Notes

 

Attendees

 

Patrich Urich

Beernie Koch

Dianne Cullinan

Warren Knoles

Mike Chilslu

Tomm Arbuckle

Craig Hullinger

 

Hullinger noted that Committee Chairman Ray Lees had to leave town on short notice and could not attend the meeting.  Lees had meet with Pat Landes and discussed sustainable development codes. Her comments are listed below:

The City and Planning Commission will be re-writing the Subdivision Ordinance later this year to address sustainable planning issues. Landes indicated that she would really appreciate the opportunity to work with our group on related issues.  Our professional, community and general experience is valued and we could assist them with several specific initiatives in the works.  The three primary issues are:

1.     Zoning code development for a new industrial classification somewhere between I-1 Industrial/Business Park and I-2 Railroad/Warehouse Industrial to accommodate the needs of a “Sustainable Industrial Technology Park” with distinctive attributes.  There is a specific business retention target in the works right now that could benefit from such a new code/classification which could significantly impact, in a positive way, our community’s land use plan.

2.    Solar Access and Wind Turbines…new codes to more effectively respond to the community’s growing interest in these renewable energy sources.

  3.    Sustainable affordable residences…the City has funding through HUD to subsidize and control the type of construction of new housing for low income residents in targeted areas of the City.  They would like to dictate that sustainable features be built into the homes.  The area of focus is the neighborhood surrounding the new Harrison School.  And, while the City can influence what the builder builds by controlling the dollars, HUD funds won’t pay for the design of such residences.  So, I see an opportunity to possibly collaborate with the architectural/engineering programs at ICC, U of I and/or Bradley to develop designs and plans for the homes.

 

The Committee discussed alternate approaches to developing standards for encouraging sustainable development in Peoria. The consensus of the group was that we want to avoid requiring too many new standards in this tough economy.  The Committee did agree that we could develop a listing of desirable green technology improvements, and encourage developers and governments to implement some of these standards.

 

The committee listed a number of potential “green” improvements that should be encouraged.  These include:

 

Promote more efficient buildings

Use passive solar orientation of buildings

Encourage solar and wind energy systems

Use recycled material in buildings

Recycle building material waste

 

Encourage rain harvesting & irrigation

Support the use of natural landscaping

Employ green roofs

Improve City and County staff knowledge of “green” techniques

Support quality construction for long lived buildings

 

Encourage mixed use development

Support walk to work programs

Encourage development that supports transit

Support efforts to redevelop older communities

Permit Live / Work Space development

 

Support natural open space and parks

Design wetlands, drainage systems, retention and bio swales into parks

Use open surface natural drainage where feasible

Require street trees

Encourage the use of geothermal energy

 

Revisit development requirements, minimizing pavement widths and costs

Update City / County codes to permit and encourage “green” development

Support the development of the local production of “green” technology equipment

Incorporate bikeways and pedestrian paths into new and older developments

 

 

 

 

 

Commission members will examine what other cities have been doing in green development. It was noted that nearby Normal is a leader in “Green” development.  We will discuss a possible trip to look at their new downtown redevelopment.

The Committee discussed the possibility of providing incentives to promote green development. We already have a program in place - Tax Increment Financing can pay for all the items listed in these notes. 

 

Federal Historic tax credits help provide 10 to 20% tax credits for the redevelopment of buildings older then1936.  The Federal tax code also provides a 30% tax credit for “green” energy investments. There is now consideration of a State program that would provide a State tax credit for redeveloping older buildings.

 

The Enterprise Zone does not at present provide abatement for green development, but staff will examine the possible revision of the Enterprise Zone for this use.  The County and City will review the potential of lowering building permit fees to support green development.

 

The Committee agreed to review these notes, and discuss them at the next meeting.

A draft of the Sustainable Technology Park Poster Plan Is attached. More information is available at http://peoria.blog.com/  

 

Charles Eckenstahler Presentation

Craig Hullinger Presentation

0 Comments

2009 Green Clerks Presentation Edit Presentation

• Share 
• Favorite 
• Get File 
• More...
 
•  

• Post to
 
• Blogger 
• WordPress 
• Twitter 
• Facebook 
• Delicious